LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: LVS via Direct routing

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LVS via Direct routing
From: "Graham David Purcocks M.A.(Oxon.)" <grahamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 14:07:19 +0100
You can only use DR if all machines are on the same network. If you are
on different networks, you need NAT and if you want to do port
redirection, and you can tunnel over WANs


On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 13:44, Ramprasad A Padmanabhan wrote:
> Hi all,
>   I am new to this list. I am trying to implement LVS on my mailservers
> running POSTFIX+SpamAssassin . I was looking for some technical docs on
> how this LVS via direct routing works and what are its limitations.
> 
> I read all about the pluses of direct routing , so why do people use
> tunnelling LVS after all ? 
> 
> Thanks
> Ram
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Netcore Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
> Website:  http://www.netcore.co.in
> Spamtraps: http://cleanmail.netcore.co.in/directory.html
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
-- 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>