LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: cluster vs. lvs

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: cluster vs. lvs
From: "Graham David Purcocks M.A.(Oxon.)" <grahamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:35:33 +0000
LVS is completed separate from your cluster. Think of it as a router. It
directs traffic to your cluster whether it be master or slave so is
essentially outside of it. You *can* use real servers as directors but
it gets real messy so its much better to keep it simple.

Graham

On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 16:10, jess patel wrote:
>  
> 
> This might be the stupidest question on earth but I was only curious....
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> Lets say there is a cluster with master node and others are just slave 
> nodes....if you are setting up lvs with director and real servers....is 
> master node the place where the director is set up and the nodes are where 
> the real servers are set up?????
> 
>  
> 
> or I am getting it wrong?
> 
>  
> 
> --p
> 
>               
> ---------------------------------
>  Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.  
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
-- 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>