|
Roberto Nibali wrote:
> On a side note, an explanation of the flags all, default and others:
>
>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-virtual-server&m=97932487110806&w=2
Thanks Roberto, very useful.
>> # ipvsadm -l -n
>> IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
>> Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
>> -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
>> TCP 217.8.220.80:25 rr
>> -> 217.8.220.73:25 Route 1 0 0
>
> Weren't the RS in the 88.198/16 range? I'm a bit confused.
Sorry, I'm still waiting for Hetzner to set up the new servers - this is
now a local test-setup.
> 1) DGW for RS2 should be the director
> 2) have you played with {send,accept}_redirect?
See my followup posting.
> Since I'm not sure anymore if I understand your network setup, would
> it be possible for you to send along a ASCII-sketch (no tabs, please)
> with IP addresses?
+-------------+ +-------------+
| 217.8.220.72| | 217.8.220.66|
| director | | default gw |
+-------------+ +-------------+
+-------------+
| 217.8.220.73|
| real server |
+-------------+
+-------------+
| 217.8.220.74|
| real server |
+-------------+
+-------------+
| 217.8.220.75|
| real server |
+-------------+
+-------------+
| 217.8.220.76|
| real server |
+-------------+
Using the LVS-DR approach with forward_shared and clients in the Hetzner
datacentre didn't work - I couldn't get the response back to the client.
This sounds like the Hetzner IP spoofing prevention getting in the way.
But I've now got it to work with as LVS-NAT, although it remains to be
seen if the same will work @Hetzner.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
|
