LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Pirahna, Ultra Monkey, any others?

To: Donald Ball <balld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Pirahna, Ultra Monkey, any others?
Cc: Paul Lussier <pll@xxxxxxxxxxx>, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 14:22:16 -0700
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 05:18:50PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
> On Mon, 8 May 2000, Horms wrote:
> 
> > At this stage Piranha and Ultra Monkey have quite similar feature sets, and
> > utilise the same underlying technology and in some instances the same code
> > - both projects use the Linux Virtual Server.  The main diferences being
> > that Piranha includes a GUI while Ultra Monkey has later revisions of the
> > Linux Virtual Server - that has fwmark support to simplify the
> > configuration of virtual services, and improvoved protection against DoS
> > attacks -  and comprehensive online documentation. I prefer Ultra Monkey,
> > but I would as I wrote it.
> 
> Are there docs anywhere for the fwmark stuff?

man ipvsadm 

The sample topologies on http://ultramonkey.org/ include examples
that use this.

-- 
Horms


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>