|
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 07:30:00AM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 9 May 2000, Horms wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 11:19:19AM -0400, Joseph Mack wrote:
> > > After using the ipvs-0.9.12-2.2.14 patch against 2.2.15
> > > the output of
> > >
> > > $ipvsadm
> >
> > Can you tell me what the output of the following commands is
> >
> > type ipvsadm
> >
> > ipvsadm -rhv
> >
> >
> > I am going to test this but I suspect that the your version if ipvsadm is
> > out of sync with ipvsadm. There have been some changes the the kernel data
> > structures that ipvsadm manipulates in recent versions of ipvs making
> > previous versions of ipvsadm incompatible with the new code. You should be
> > looking for ipvsadm v1.9 if you are using ipvs-0.9.12-2.2.14.
>
> May be we have to add a version check in ipvsadm. We can
> print a warning message or just to exit if the version in the
> proc fs doesn't match. Is that sounds good? But may be we have to
I was thinking about that but the current problem relates to old versions
and not new versions. In any case it would probably prevent this problem in
the future. I think I have grown to like the idea. A patch is on its way.
--
Horms
|
