|
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 06:30:12AM -0400, Joseph Mack wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 07:30:00AM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> > >
> > > May be we have to add a version check in ipvsadm. We can
> > > print a warning message or just to exit if the version in the
> > > proc fs doesn't match. Is that sounds good? But may be we have to
> >
> > I was thinking about that but the current problem relates to old versions
> > and not new versions. In any case it would probably prevent this problem in
> > the future. I think I have grown to like the idea. A patch is on its way.
>
> This may be rediculous, but how about ipvsadm detects the LVS version info
> and runs the appropriate code. That way the most recent ipvsadm will run
> everthing.
I think that would lend to a terible mess over time, supporting depreciated
code. I have put a test in that checks against a minimum and maximum IPVS
version and prints out (what I think is) an informative warning if the
requirement is not met and procedes regardless.
--
Horms
|
