lvs-users
|
To: | Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Network Block Device w/ RAID for Content Replication (Was: Re: load balance web site) |
Cc: | Atif Ghaffar <atif@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Hechtbauer <anti@xxxxxxx>, tc lewis <tcl@xxxxxxxxx>, Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>, <pu@xxxxxxxxxx>, <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
From: | Atif Ghaffar <atif@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 03 Jun 2000 17:05:39 +0200 |
Quoting Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Sat, 3 Jun 2000, Atif Ghaffar wrote: > > how is the writelocking acheived? There is only one /var/spool/imap > directory and it's nbd exported to the backend servers and nbd > has normal filesystem write locking? The actual /var/spool/imap is on the backend server. Its accessing it from a raid natively. Then this server is exporting it to frontend nodes. The frontend nodes are mounting it read only. > > > The front end servers only read mails via an imap server. > > OK the INBOX is on the users machine not the cluster. > > > For the application I am using IMP (http://www.horde.org/imp) > > OK thanks > > Joe > > > -- > Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx > > -- Perfection is our goal, excellence will be tolerated. -- J. Yahl |
Previous by Date: | Re: Network Block Device w/ RAID for Content Replication (Was: Re: load balance web site), Joseph Mack |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Network Block Device w/ RAID for Content Replication (Was: Re: load balance web site), Joseph Mack |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Network Block Device w/ RAID for Content Replication (Was: Re: load balance web site), Joseph Mack |
Next by Thread: | Re: Network Block Device w/ RAID for Content Replication (Was: Re: load balance web site), Joseph Mack |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |