lvs-users
|
To: | Atif Ghaffar <atif@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Network Block Device w/ RAID for Content Replication (Was: Re: load balance web site) |
Cc: | Andi Hechtbauer <anti@xxxxxxx>, tc lewis <tcl@xxxxxxxxx>, Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>, pu@xxxxxxxxxx, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
From: | Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 3 Jun 2000 11:46:37 -0400 (EDT) |
On Sat, 3 Jun 2000, Atif Ghaffar wrote: > > how is the writelocking acheived? There is only one /var/spool/imap > > directory and it's nbd exported to the backend servers and nbd > > has normal filesystem write locking? > The actual /var/spool/imap is on the backend server. > Its accessing it from a raid natively. > > Then this server is exporting it to frontend nodes. > > The frontend nodes are mounting it read only. When the client retrieves the mail from /var/spool/imap/user the spool file has to be deleted or have parts of it deleted? Joe -- Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Previous by Date: | Re: Network Block Device w/ RAID for Content Replication (Was: Re: load balance web site), Atif Ghaffar |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: Network Block Device w/ RAID for Content Replication (Was: Re: load balance web site), Nicolas Huillard |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Network Block Device w/ RAID for Content Replication (Was: Re: load balance web site), Atif Ghaffar |
Next by Thread: | RE: load balance web site, Clint Byrum |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |