LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Announce ldirectord version 1.13

To: "'lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Announce ldirectord version 1.13
From: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 14:51:28 -0700
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 02:15:35PM -0400, Joseph Mack wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Horms wrote:
> 
> > You should take a look at
> > http://ultramonkey.sourceforge.net/ultramonkey-1.0.1/topologies/example-lb-3-fwmark.html
> >  
> 
> Hi Horms,
> 
>       In this example you have adresses from both the 192.168.0.0/24 and
> 192.168.6.0/24 networks. Is this correct?

Yes, in this example 192.168.6.0/24 is used for actual addressed of
the servers on the server network: 192.128.6.1, 192.128.6.4 and
192.128.6.5. 192.198.0.0/24 is used for virtual addresses. I have
just used two class C's here for no partucular reason. 

>       When you say the 
> 
> " The LVS server needs to be configured to see traffic for the virtual
> addresses"
> 
> do you mean the director?

Yes. I have used the term LVS Server in lieu of director throughout the
site as this reflected the ipvsadm man page at the time - and to this
day to my knowledge.

-- 
Horms


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>