LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: routing issues

To: Brad Benson <brad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: routing issues
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 14:09:45 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Brad Benson wrote:

> I'm still having trouble accessing my real servers when the secondary
> linuxdirector is active.  As long as the the primary director is up
> everything is fine.  When the secondary director takes over, things start
> to get weird.  Here's the behavior I'm seeing:
> 
> director1 active
> ----------------
> routing table correct on director
> real servers can ping any IP, inside or outside director
> real servers have default route of 192.168.0.3, the internal ip of the
>    primary director
> all real servers accessible from client outside director
> 
> director2 active
> ---------------
> director2 successfully takes over all IP's from director1, including
>   192.168.0.3 (the default route for the real servers) and all IP's are
>   pingable from outside the director
> real servers can ping any IP inside the director (192.168.0.0/24)
> real servers can ping any external IP's on director2, but nothing else on
>    the external net
> all real servers are accessible from the director, but not from outside
>   clients
> 
> 
> What am I missing here?  It looks like a routing issue.  I'm guessing that
> for some reason the real servers can't get packets back to the client
> which is why I can't make a connection to any of the real servers.  The
> default route for all real servers is 192.168.0.3.  This route doesn't
> change, but the director answering to that IP does.  Could this be causing
> problems?

I don't know much about this, so take it for what it's worth...
Does the MAC address of 192.168.0.3 change when you do the changeover?
($arp -a)

Joe

--
Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>