LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Oddity building LBLC

To: Martin Hamilton <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Oddity building LBLC
Cc: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 23:23:53 +0800 (CST)

On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Martin Hamilton wrote:

> 
> | I assume Wensong tried this scheduler on UP, so you are the first
> | who enabled the SMP option. There is a very big chance LBLC to work
> | on SMP with your patch :)
> 
> I always tend to build my kernels (even on uniprocessor machines) with
> SMP enabled, because I remember (back in 2.1.x days) having problems
> compiling kernels that didn't have SMP enabled.  Must try building
> with SMP disabled again sometime!
> 

That's true. I should enable the SMP option, so that that stupid locking
bug could be avoided in compiling time.

> Will let you know if there's anything interesting to report from our
> experiments with LBLC...
> 

Please try the ipvs-1.0.0, where the uninitilized locking bug was fixed
and full expiration check was added.

Thanks,

Wensong



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>