LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Alternatives to MON

To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Alternatives to MON
From: "David D.W. Downey" <david.downey@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 01:42:22 -0800
Is there a way to use LVS to handle DNS? For reasons I can't go into, my
company would like to use our LVS to handle our DNS if possible.



----- Original Message -----
From: "Horms" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2000 11:28 AM
Subject: Re: Alternatives to MON


> On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 02:15:18PM -0500, Ted Pavlic wrote:
> > Joe --
> >
> >     Sorry for responding to an old thread -- I just noticed it now.
> >
> > > the other one is ldirectord.
> >
> >     The last time I checked, ldirectord was more suited for HTTP-only
> > providers, yesno?
>
> No. Ldirectord works can talk to http, https and ftp servers. Adding
> extra protocols is easy. There is also a mode where a server
> can be connected to but no content checking is done, effectivly
> a ping that can be used for any protocol.
>
> --
> Horms -> 2c worth
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>