|
Yeah I know. I've explained that to the company. This is just something they
seem hell bent on doing.
> David,
>
> DNS has inherent redundancy built into the protocol.
> I'd use two (or more) geographically diverse DNS servers. In fact, I think
the
> RFC explicitely calls for this already.
>
> This is going to give more redundancy than LVS will since you eliminate
the
> network as being a single point of failure.
>
> To answer your question though, yes, I think that using LVS to handle DNS
would
> be possible, but I really can't think of any case where you'd actually
want to
> do this.
>
> Cheers,
> Raj Dutt
> Voxel dot Net, Inc.
>
|
