|
Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Michael E Brown wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Mikael Eriksson wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Roberto Nibali wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Apply following patch: http://www.linux-vs.org/hidden-2.3.41-1.diff
> > > > and proceed to setup the hidden devices like for 2.2.x kernels.
> > >
> > > I never saw an explanation as to why the hidden-patch that actually made
> > > into
> > > the 2.2-kernel didn't make it into 2.4. This is a patch of general
> >
> > Why doesn't the author of the patch submit it to Alan Cox for inclusion in
> > the -ac* series? Alan seems to have opened up his tree to exactly these
> > kinds of patches.
>
> FYI, the patch was submitted one year ago (you see from the
> version when it was created) to the network maintainers and they
> responded. So, if the question is whether they know, the answer is yes.
> Alan is not informed directly for this patch but the discussions on the
> kernel mail list are public. The need is this feature to be replaced with
> another one but there is still no another solution :) It is known that
> this feature is not used only from the LVS community but everyone can
> read the discussions and to see the different opinions on this issue.
If they refuse to include the patch why don't integrate it into the
ipvs-patch?
So you have only one patch with all the needed functionality...
Juri
--
juri.haberland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
system engineer innominate AG
clustering & security the linux architects
tel: +49-30-308806-45 fax: -77 http://www.innominate.com
|
