|
* On 03/21/01 whc2u@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> (for linux kernel 2.2.x)
> Unfortunately, there does not seem to be a way to dynamically
> raise this per process limit (correct me if I'm wrong) without
> recompiling the kernel and resetting NR_OPEN in
> /usr/src/linux/include/linux/limits.h
>
Then again I could be wrong and its (1024 * 1024)
> -------------------------------------
>
> I'm using LVS/DR and have been playing around with the same
> issues. But in this case since the return path is not through
> LVS, I wondering if making these type of changes on LVS box
> requrires some additional cooridation/changes on my "real"
> web servers.
>
>
> > The interesting thing to know is, what are the Limits for the LVS
> > (with NAT)...The number of available sockets? 65535 simultanous
> > connections? the memory ? the masq table?
> >
> > we did not have it in production yet (saturday i think). If something
> > goes wrong we have a Bigip
> > as backup system :) ...but only for backup ...
> >
> > cu ...
> >
> > Hendrik Thiel
> > Falk eSolutions AG
> > Tel: 02841/9097355
> > Fax: 02841-9097331
> >
>
-- Will
w@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
