|
> Not sure :) The patch against 2.4 is attached (I still
> didn't tested it).
it works for the tests I did (apparently you don't need to test
your code like the rest of us)
group1 (ftp,ftp-data)
group2 (http,https)
So do we support two behaviours for fwmarks (CIP->VIP-RIP)
and (CIP->fwmark->RIP) or do we just support one of them?
Are people expecting the original behaviour now
or are they not aware of the choices?
I don't want to break anyone's setup, but it seems to
me that we have to support the CIP-fwmark-RIP setup
or most of the advantages of fwmarks are gone
Joe
--
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center,
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA
|
