Re: ip_masq_ftp in not in kernel in 2.2.19

[Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>]

        Hello,

On Tue, 1 May 2001, Joseph Mack wrote:

> >         But some guys will not like to open all ports :) And what happens
> > in the case when two real servers announce same VPORT for the VIP?
> > I assume the real server packets don't go through the director?
>
> The packets from the client to the real-server have to return via the
> director or they will not arrive on the VIP.

        If the real server sends packets with saddr=VIP they can't go
through the director.

> >         So, the question remains open: is active ftp working for
> > LVS-NAT without the in_ports option.
>
> what is in_ports?

        The 2.2.19 way to open ports for FTP port forwarding including
LVS-NAT FTP. The only place where I see any info is in the sources.

> By default, most of the browsers
> > use the passive option and may be this problem is not observed.
>
> I got active (command line) ftp to work without the ftp module

        LVS-NAT?

> Joe


Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>