LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: ip_masq_ftp in not in kernel in 2.2.19

To: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ip_masq_ftp in not in kernel in 2.2.19
Cc: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 10:26:40 -0400
Julian Anastasov wrote:
> 
.
> >
> > what is in_ports?
> 
>         The 2.2.19 way to open ports for FTP port forwarding including
> LVS-NAT FTP. The only place where I see any info is in the sources.

OK
 
> > By default, most of the browsers
> > > use the passive option and may be this problem is not observed.
> >
> > I got active (command line) ftp to work without the ftp module
> 
>         LVS-NAT?

yes (forget whether it was 2.4.x or 2.2.x). I had 2 real-servers
with different content in ~ftp/pub. I could download any file
I could list, no matter how many times I logged on. I would
expect if 20 was going to one real-server and 21 was going
to another that I would be listing from one real-server and
trying to download from another and the download would fail
sometimes.

Joe

-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center, 
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>