|
Julian Anastasov wrote:
> >
> > Of course, the ftp virtual service has to be persistent port 0.
use persistent fwmark, then it's easy.
> But some guys will not like to open all ports :) And what happens
> in the case when two real servers announce same VPORT for the VIP?
> I assume the real server packets don't go through the director?
The packets from the client to the real-server have to return via the
director or they will not arrive on the VIP.
> So, the question remains open: is active ftp working for
> LVS-NAT without the in_ports option.
what is in_ports?
By default, most of the browsers
> use the passive option and may be this problem is not observed.
I got active (command line) ftp to work without the ftp module
Joe
--
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center,
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA
|
