LVS
lvs-users
[Top] [All Lists]
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org
<prev [Date] next> <prev [Thread] next>

Re: NT Realservers?

from [Joseph Mack] [Permanent Link]
To: LVS Mailing List <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: NT Realservers?
From: Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 18:29:41 -0400 (EDT) 
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Bowie Bailey wrote:

> Is anyone else using NT boxes as their realservers?
> 
> I have an LVS-DR setup with two NT boxes as the realservers.  It works, but
> it is very slow -- especially if there is a broken image link on the page.
>

Just in case it's not the NT box, does the problem go away if you
substitute a Linux box. There are other things that can go wrong, you
can have the routing wrong, identd problems, DNS wrong...

Joe

--
Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: lb'ing mysql, Joseph Mack
Next by Date:  Re: Netscape persistence [Was Re: success: LV-NAT working, Julian Anastasov
Previous by Thread:  NT Realservers?, Bowie Bailey
Next by Thread:  Re: NT Realservers?, again.zhang
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]