LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: NT Realservers?

To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: NT Realservers?
Cc: LVS Mailing List <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: <again.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 12:31:59 +0800
Check the lvs-howto on linuxvirtualserver.org site for realserver is NT, It 
won't be a problem for you to set it up. 

you may config your IIS with KeepAlive for http connections, if there is a  
miss link in your page, the connection channel will broken, the web browser 
initialize new connection, which may effect the response. 

but if you choose MS platform, win2000 may be a little good for real 
server,just easy for the loop adapter. I switch MS's buildin load balance to 
LVS, the realserver's loads decrease nealy 30%.

-again
 
来 自: Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey@xxxxxxx>:

Is anyone else using NT boxes as their realservers?

I have an LVS-DR setup with two NT boxes as the realservers.  It
works, but
it is very slow -- especially if there is a broken image link on the
page.

All of the documentation I can find assumes that the realservers will
be
Linux boxes.
 I spoke with RedHat's support and they seem to think
that it
is a configuration issue on the NT systems.

If anyone has a running setup using NT, please let me know how you
configured the realservers so I can determine if I have the NT servers
set
up properly.

Thanks,
Bowie

_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>