|
It is important to know that which version of Windows NT you set up.
We really tested alot of Windows NT 4.0 and Windows 2000 realservers in the
field,
surely LVS is Linux box based in RedHat 6.x, 7.0.
It works, however I think the performance of the Windows series is not better
than Linux realservers. ...Just my opinion.
Please check the routing path with the command "route print" in the command
console of NT.
Another question I will answer you willingly.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bowie Bailey" <Bowie_Bailey@xxxxxxx>
To: "LVS Mailing List" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 3:17 AM
Subject: NT Realservers?
Is anyone else using NT boxes as their realservers?
I have an LVS-DR setup with two NT boxes as the realservers. It works, but
it is very slow -- especially if there is a broken image link on the page.
All of the documentation I can find assumes that the realservers will be
Linux boxes. I spoke with RedHat's support and they seem to think that it
is a configuration issue on the NT systems.
If anyone has a running setup using NT, please let me know how you
configured the realservers so I can determine if I have the NT servers set
up properly.
Thanks,
Bowie
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
