|
Hi Peter,
[Answering with a big smile in my face]
> I have always thought MS has fantastic performance at the cost of stability.
> Nobody except linux zealots and freebsd 'weirdos' (I use that term with a
> smile) believe that MS has crappy performance.
Well, I'm a Plan9 addicted and I won't say MS has crappy performance,
but it's just never as good as an equivalent Linux/BSD box :)
> (Well ok, maybe IIS performs badly through LVS? Don't ask my why..)
Read the source please, LVS has nothing to do with the performance
of your webserver!
BTW, the performance impact on Win2k servers is mainly because of the
high context switching times windwows still has. I think we can both
live and be happy in our worlds, no world has to hide behind the other,
Windows 2000 can be as good or bad as Linux, but never as stable as :)
Have phun, I'm leaving for home, hope I didn't start a flamewar,
Best regards,
Roberto Nibali, ratz
--
mailto: `echo NrOatSz@xxxxxxxxx | sed 's/[NOSPAM]//g'`
|
