LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: HTTP 1.1 or name based httpd on VS-NAT

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: HTTP 1.1 or name based httpd on VS-NAT
From: Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 16:13:51 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Paul Baker wrote:

> The HTTP 1.1 request (and also 1.0 requests from any modern browser) 
> contain a Host: header which specifies the hostname of the server. As 
> long as the webservers on the real-servers are aware that they are 
> serving this hostname. There should be no issue with 1.1 vs 1.0 http 
> requests.

So is that the <virtualHost ...>

or the servername underneath?

what if instead of the name of the VIP, I surf to the actual IP?
There is no device with the VIP on the VS-NAT real-server. Does
there need to be one? Will an entry in /etc/hosts that maps the VIP
to the public name do?

Joe
--
Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>