LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: HTTP 1.1 or name based httpd on VS-NAT

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: HTTP 1.1 or name based httpd on VS-NAT
From: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 16:31:44 -0400
Paul Baker wrote:
> 
> Joseph Mack wrote:
> 
> >
> > So is that the <virtualHost ...>
> 
> Yes
> 
> >
> > or the servername underneath?
> 
> Servername should ideally be set to the reverse dns of the VIP (or what
> you would like the reverse dns of the VIP to have been)

so both virtualHost and servername should be the reverse dns of the VIP?

Joe

-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center, 
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>