LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: HTTP 1.1 or name based httpd on VS-NAT

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: HTTP 1.1 or name based httpd on VS-NAT
From: Paul Baker <pbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 15:40:29 -0500
Joseph Mack wrote:


so both virtualHost and servername should be the reverse dns of the VIP?


Yes. Your Servername should be the reverse dns of the VIP and you need to have a Virtualhost entry for it as well. In the event that you are serving more than one domain on that VIP, then you need to have a VirtualHost entry for each domain as well.

--
=======================================================================
Paul J. Baker                               Internet Systems Technician
pbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                                  Where2GetIt.com
phone 847-498-0111x234
fax   847-480-7422
=======================================================================




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>