lvs-users
|
To: | <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: server monitoring with weight changes |
From: | "Alexandre Cassen" <alexandre.cassen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:01:23 +0100 (MET) |
Hello, > We're > currently working out the state machine for NECP_STOP/NECP_STOP_ACK and a > possible event handler for healthcheck daemons running in parallel (keepalived > for example) to feedbackd. As for the project I'm very confident that it will > please a lot of LVS users. Why not extending directly Keepalived ? you will benefit the already low-level framework... and this will centralize the devel task... Where can I have a look to some draft paper on this work ? :) Regards, Alexandre |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Problem with LVS DR - 10065 Host is unreachable, Sébastien Bonnet |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: server monitoring with weight changes, Roberto Nibali |
Previous by Thread: | Re: server monitoring with weight changes, Roberto Nibali |
Next by Thread: | Re: server monitoring with weight changes, Roberto Nibali |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |