|
I have quite an interest in a keepalived + kernel lrp for Leaf Bering.
Currently running Bering UclibC 1.2 if that's what you are running and
already have the two compiled any chance you could email them to me?
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 13:50, Peter Mueller wrote:
> > > As I'm most familir with RedHat, I am working with LVS in
> > RedHat 7.3
> > > right now after running into some troubles with RH9 and the missing
> > > kernel module... But I just was wondering if anyone has
> > reliably got
> > > LVS running on any more minimalistic distributions. I was
> > looking at
> > > some of the distributions on www.linux.org in the "Minimalist"
> > > category but there are a lot of them.
> >
> > the kernel build is idenpendant of the distribution.
>
> You should probably use a distribution that you're familiar with. Redhat
> 7.2 or 7.3 seems to be very stable and a good choice - for now. Just be
> aware that Redhat is phasing out support in just about 1 year for 7.3. This
> means you might have to scrounge for patches/updated rpms on your own.
>
> If you want to go 'minimalist' route, I could supply a LEAF package of
> keepalived + kernel that runs LVS on flash ram if you're interested ;)
>
> > >
> > > I am strongly tempted to just use the standard kernel but as I've
> > > never had a reason to mess with the kernel before (please
> > don't sneer
> > > at me;-), I'm not quite sure what it would break if I went with the
> > > standard kernel on an existing RH7.3 or RH9 install.. ?
> >
> > I would expect nothing would break.
> >
>
> Like Joe says, LVS is very stable. If you want to avoid making your own
> kernels, Horms has SRPMS available @ ultramonkey.org.
>
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
