|
I am in process of learning a bit more about feedbackd.. thanks for the note.
our work is still a bit different but certainly there is some synergy with the
registration process
Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 03:05:54PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> > On 2003-10-10T12:08:15,
> > "William V. Wollman" <wwollman@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> >
> > > We have worked with LVS to implement something we call the Server Load
> > > Balancing Registration Protocol. It allows a server to plug into a
> > > network with the LVS and register it services with the LVS.
> >
> > Cool! Is that based on the Service Location Protocol?
> >
> > > The LVS is then automatically configured to balance the services
> > > registered. We did not modify LVS directly but created a Java program
> > > that processes the real server registration messages and then
> > > automatically configures the LVS. The real server requires the
> > > installation of a Java program to build the registration messages and
> > > register its services. One benefit is plug and play SLB with minimal
> > > administration. Another benefit is controlled configuration
> > > management.
> >
> > Yes, that sounds good. Automatic discovery is certainly helpful. Though
> > I'd be a bit worried about a Java program, but that's because of my bad
> > experiences with their resource utilization ;-)
>
> I thought I should throw this fish into the fire.
> Feedbackd has some of this capability as well.
> http://www.redfishsoftware.com.au/
>
> --
> Horms
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
