|
Hello,
Yes, it is great to hear that we can handle sessions with a database. I
will look further inside this idea.
One question :
On "www.linuxvirtualserver.org/HighAvailability.html", it is told about
CODA filesystem. But, here, some of you are talking about NFS or SMB.
Can you explain (quickly) the pros and cons between CODA, NFS and SMB?
Note : SMB is a Windows filesystem and my servers are all under
GNU/Linux. So the question is rather on CODA/NFS.
Note2 : my goal with LVS is to do load-balancing and HA as well. (HTTPS,
sessions handling and SQL database)
Thanks.
Le mar 28/10/2003 à 19:57, Jacob Coby a écrit :
> > Jacob Coby:
> > >
> > > I don't remember exactly how PHP sessions work, but I think if you were
> to
> > > host the stored session directory (session.save_path) on a NFS/SMB
> share,
> > > you wouldn't have any problems.
> >
> > You can use a database backend for your PHP sessions. Saving them on a NFS
> > share also work, but the database approach fails more gracefully.
>
> Ahh, I didn't now that PHP sessions would work with a db backend. A
> database would be a much better solution than NFS.
>
> -Jacob
> Listingbook.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
