|
Andrew Swaine wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> In the howto it recommends that LVS-NAT is used for small sites.
It's not true. Where do I say this and I'll fix it :-)
All of the forwarding methods are equally good.
> Is there a bandwidth limit / number of pages served that you would
> recommend changing from LVS-Nat to DR?
LVS-NAT was the first forwarder written and it got most of the
early attention. There is no arp problem with LVS-NAT. However
service have to run on the RIP rather than the VIP. With
LVS-DR, the service runs on the VIP but you have to handle
the arp problem
Joe
--
Joseph Mack PhD, High Performance Computing & Scientific Visualization
SAIC, Supporting the EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 919-541-0007
Federal Contact - John B. Smith 919-541-1087 - smith.johnb@xxxxxxx
|
