LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: LVS-Nat vs DR

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LVS-Nat vs DR
From: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 06:16:59 -0500
Andrew Swaine wrote:

> 
> I should have said "Number of real servers".
> In the Mini-howto LVS-Nat is low and DR/TUN are high.

Thanks I'll fix it (sometime, I'm busy right now and probably
won't get around to it till the end of the year).

The statements you read are from the 2.2 days. LVS-NAT for 2.4
is quite different.

Joe

-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, High Performance Computing & Scientific Visualization
SAIC, Supporting the EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 919-541-0007
Federal Contact - John B. Smith 919-541-1087 - smith.johnb@xxxxxxx
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>