Re: LVS-Nat vs DR

lvs-users

Re: LVS-Nat vs DR

from [Horms]

To:	"LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: LVS-Nat vs DR
From:	Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 5 Nov 2003 14:31:14 +0900

On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 04:40:40PM +1300, Andrew Swaine wrote:
> Sorry, must be going insane with all the reading that I've been doing on
> LVS.
> 
> I should have said "Number of real servers".
> In the Mini-howto LVS-Nat is low and DR/TUN are high.

That isn't really accurate either. 

-- 
Horms

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LVS-Nat vs DR, Andrew Swaine Re: LVS-Nat vs DR, Joseph Mack RE: LVS-Nat vs DR, Andrew Swaine Re: LVS-Nat vs DR, Horms <= Re: LVS-Nat vs DR, Joseph Mack Re: LVS-Nat vs DR, Horms Re: LVS-Nat vs DR, John Barrett Re: LVS-Nat vs DR, Horms RE: LVS-Nat vs DR, Francois JEANMOUGIN

Previous by Date:	Re: LVS-Nat vs DR, Horms
Next by Date:	Re: A question on smtp service with LVS, Horms
Previous by Thread:	RE: LVS-Nat vs DR, Andrew Swaine
Next by Thread:	Re: LVS-Nat vs DR, Joseph Mack
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]