LVS
lvs-users
[Top] [All Lists]
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org
<prev [Date] next> <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LVS-Nat vs DR

from [Horms] [Permanent Link]
To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LVS-Nat vs DR
From: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 14:28:28 +0900 
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 09:32:36PM -0500, John Barrett wrote:
> Horms -- enlighten me a little -- NAT requires that realservers use the LVS
> box as the default route so that NAT can be preformed on the outbound
> packets -- right ?? DR doesnt because all the realservers are bound to the
> hidden VIP and can send responses directly out via the default gateway.

Yes

-- 
Horms
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: RedHat End-of-Life/Ultramonkey, Horms
Next by Date:  Re: LVS-Nat vs DR, Horms
Previous by Thread:  Re: LVS-Nat vs DR, John Barrett
Next by Thread:  RE: LVS-Nat vs DR, Francois JEANMOUGIN
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]