LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Antefacto Question

To: ken <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Antefacto Question
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 11:30:15 +0200 (EET)
        Hello,

On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, ken wrote:

> A couple questions about the Antefacto patch functionality.
>
> (1)  Would the Antefacto patch allow a director to do destination NAT (DNAT)
> onto the same network for a VIP?

        Yes but it is not related to this feature

> (2)  Would this patch also allow LVS/IPTABLES/IPROUTE2 to work nicely 
> together,
> so as the director could also do things such as correctly route inbound &
> outbound packets for multi-ISP connections using route tables, FMARKs, and
> IPTABLES rules?

        Not sure for fwmark but there is new unrelated option 
"snat_reroute" which for now is part of the nfct patch: 

        http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nfct/

        This option helps for routing in in->out direction.

> Reading most of the archived messages regarding this patch, I'm guessing the
> answer to both of these questions is "Yes".  I just wanted some re-assurance
> from the list before I put this into production.
>
> Thank you,
> Ken

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>