LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Virtual Interfaces?

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Virtual Interfaces?
From: <ntadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 13:28:35 -0800
> > Ok, I see now how your proof of concept works.  I can be a little dense
> > sometimes..;)  Do you have any idea what the differences are between
using
> > ifconfig and ip addr?
>
> here's a starting point
>
> http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.policy_routing.html

Thanks.

>
>
> > When I add an IP with ifconfig it shows up with ip
> > addr show...
>
> but not the reverse

# ip addr add 192.168.108.1 dev eth1 brd & label eth1:1
# ifconfig
outputs:
eth1:1    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:02:B3:1E:41:33
          inet addr:192.168.108.1  Bcast:0.0.0.0  Mask:255.255.255.255
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          Interrupt:17 Base address:0xec80 Memory:fe303000-fe303038

??  am I not doing something right?

>
> > I am
> > wondering if it would be safe to reduce this as it is adding additional
> > minutes to the failover time that we would like to reclaim.
>
> look at the ampersand at the end of the
>
> done&

Maybe I'm being dense again, but I don't understand the significance of the
ampersand...

Thanks Again,
Billy Olson

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>