LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Problems with LVS TUN and adsl running NAT

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Problems with LVS TUN and adsl running NAT
From: "Viperman .::." <viperman777@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 12:24:02 -0200
pppoe is OK, its done inside the adsl modem.
the problem is, on the director, i have to use NAT with the adsl line.
So in my director, I don't have the VIP set on my eth, i have a LAN interface, like 192.168.0.2

On my Real Server, i tried both to set the LAN ip AND the VIP in the eth interface, but nothing.

Any help will be highly appreciated.

Thanks,

Leni


From: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Problems with LVS TUN and adsl running NAT
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 07:15:32 -0500

Viperman wrote:
>
>     I've been successfully using LVS TUN using fixed ip adsl lines.
> Never had a
>     problem.
>     Now I'm trying to setup the same LVS TUN using a dynamic ip line
> adsl, but
>     the adsl modem does pppoe and it uses NAT.
>     So instead of having the VIP set on my eth0:0, i have a LAN ip on
> it, like
>     192.168.0.1


don't know anything about pppoe, but is this the realserver or the director?
where is the VIP then?


Joe

--
Joseph Mack PhD, High Performance Computing & Scientific Visualization
SAIC, Supporting the EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 919-541-0007
Federal Contact - John B. Smith 919-541-1087 - smith.johnb@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

_________________________________________________________________
High-speed users?be more efficient online with the new MSN Premium Internet Software. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=byoa/prem&ST=1

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>