|
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 02:49:23PM -0800, Dave Lowenstein wrote:
> easy question: do my linux real servers need to have the hidden patch?
Yes, because you are putting the vip in lo:180 on
the real servers. If you do not hide this then they
will answer ARP requests for the VIP and traffic
may end up going directly to one real server rather than the
Linux Directors.
If you do not want to have to worry about this I would
suggest using LVS-NAT instead of LVS-DR.
> not as easy question:
>
> I still can't get the most basic config (single real server, telnet)
> to work.
>
> i can telnet to the VIP from the real server, but not from anywhere else.
>
> when i telnet to the VIP from an external client I neither get connection
> refused (like i normally would if telnet wasn't running) nor do i get a
> connection.
>
> i'm sure more info would help
>
> director:
> 2 nics, one set up with eth0:180 as x.x.x.180 (VIP) and eth0 as x.x.x.222
> as the real IP.
> eth1:9 has 192.168.1.2 as the DIP
>
> real server is 192.168.1.111 with the VIP on the lo:180 interface.
>
> both computers can ping each other on the 192.168.1.0/24 network.
>
> when I run the rc.lvs_dr script on the client it says that i get 5 errors
> but i think that most of those are related to it complaining that i don't
> have the hidden patch (hence the first question).
>
> where should I start trying to troubleshoot this?
--
Horms
|
