LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: sendmail cluster

To: <jcouzens@xxxxxx>,<lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: sendmail cluster
From: "Peter Mueller" <pmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:08:29 -0700
> We're having great success with Qmail using a multi-TB device from
> raid-zone.com.  You have to remember, there is always a 

Site gives a 404.  Did you mean http://www.raidzone.com/?  This site
doesn't list prices.

> single point of
> failure somewhere, the best you can do is just make sure its off your
> network ;)

So this device is NFS mounted, or shared-scsi?  Either way is
potentially very dangerous.  I remember working for a large company that
had a majority-site meltdown due to the primary NFS server dying.  It
turned out the SCSI cable was chewed on by a rat.

FYI the linux-ha mailing list has lots of words of advice on either
topic in their archives.

> Knowing what sort of traffic you plan to throw at it is pretty key. 
> We're in the 600K to 1M range in terms of volume per day.

If you're doing this on 1-2 servers then I am impressed with qmail.  Not
enough to migrate from postfix, but to each his own.  Maybe if I turn
into a spammer I will use it.

RE: spamassassin speed - it got a lot faster for me when I:
1.) switched spamasssassin to use spamc/spamd.
2.) migrated the spamassassin / anomy setup to a tmpfs mount
3.) turned off rbl checks (skip_rbl_checks 1)

P
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>