|
Why do you have to set it like either? As far as I know
you shouldn't have to explicitly set a VIP on the director.
They are virtual IP's after all. The LVS should set up
the VIP and answer for ARPs.
Monty Ree wrote:
>
> Hello, all.
>
> I have one question about the VIP at LVS-DR.
> Some manuals say that VIP at the Director should be set like below.
>
> 1)
> ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.10.10 netmask 255.255.255.255 broadcast
> 192.168.10.10 up
>
> But I set like below and works well.
> 2)
> ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.10.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast
> 192.168.10.255 up
>
> Surely, if RealServer, should be set like 1) because of arp problem, But
> this is a LVS-DR Director and it needs not set like above.
>
> I don't know why should like above(1) at Director too.
> I have operated some LVS-DRs and 1), 2) works well together.
> Which is right?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> 행운의 주인공이 이번엔 나일꺼야, 진짜루... 인터넷 복권
> http://www.msn.co.kr/money/interlotto/
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
>
|
