|
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 02:56:50PM +0100, Francois JEANMOUGIN wrote:
>
>
> Horms:
>
>
> > I am not sure that I understand your statement.
>
> Sometimes, I am not sure if I understand my own ones...
>
> > But persistant templates are _in addition to_
> > connection entries. And thus only increase
> > memory usage.
>
> Yes, a persitence template increase the memory usage, but not by client but
> by template. So, if you have a persistence mask of 255.0.0.0, then you will
> have one entry (128 bytes) for one class A, not for each IP in the class.
>
> So if you need persitence but have memory problems, you can use a pesistence
> mask to reduce memory usage. My statement was confusing because I was talking
> about NONE entries in the connection table, which are the way persitence
> templates are shown using ipvsadm -Lcn.
Ok, now I understand. Yes, I agree with you.
--
Horms
|
