lvs-users
|
To: | Dan Trainor <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Using DNS as a load-balancer [was RE: talk by Radware, acommercial loadbalancer] |
Cc: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
From: | Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 18 Oct 2005 12:58:15 +0900 |
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:19:11AM -0600, Dan Trainor wrote: > Horms wrote: > > If you wish to circumvent DNS, I wish you good luck. > > > > ...not completely. Just to rely on DNS as little as absolutely possible. > > Sorry, I've been out of town for a few days. > > It's the best that I could come up with as of late. I've taken a great > look at Super Sparrow, to which I give you great thanks. But I think > that there may be other options out there which I have not been made > aware of. That's the whole reason why I joined this list. Sure, there are lots of options, and its a pretty interesting topic to think about. I'm pretty convinced DNS needs to be in the mix, as that means that end-user applications don't need to be updated. -- Horms |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | I can't install ipvsadm on fedora core 4, Nguyen Tran The Nguyen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Ldirectord and DNS problem using TCP and UDP, Horms |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Using DNS as a load-balancer [was RE: talk by Radware,acommercial loadbalancer], Dan Trainor |
Next by Thread: | Re: Using DNS as a load-balancer [was RE: talk by Radware,acommercial loadbalancer], Dan Trainor |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |