lvs-users
|
To: | Dan Trainor <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Using DNS as a load-balancer [was RE: talk by Radware, acommercial loadbalancer] |
Cc: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Cc: | idcodan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
From: | Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:10:07 +0900 |
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 12:02:24PM -0600, Dan Trainor wrote: > Horms wrote: > > > > Sure, there are lots of options, and its a pretty interesting topic > > to think about. I'm pretty convinced DNS needs to be in the mix, > > as that means that end-user applications don't need to be updated. > > > > Horms - > > And I completely agree with you. I think that we can also agree on the > fact that, if anything were to break, it would be DNS. With that being > said, although DNS is critical in this application, it's use and > reliance should be kept to a minimum. Indeed we can agree. -- Horms |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: help on ldirectord, Horms |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Ldirectord and DNS problem using TCP and UDP, Horms |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Using DNS as a load-balancer [was RE: talk by Radware,acommercial loadbalancer], Dan Trainor |
Next by Thread: | Re: Using DNS as a load-balancer [was RE: talk by Radware, a commercial loadbalancer], Peter J Milanese |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |