LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: LVS-NAT or direct routing or...?

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LVS-NAT or direct routing or...?
From: Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 10:48:06 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Kristoffer Egefelt wrote:

Problem:
All mail looks like they come from the loadbalancer's primary ip.

the client sends to the VIP; the reply must come from the VIP.

With LVS-NAT you can associate a different name with each realserver.

http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.services.single-port.html#http_checks

look in the section on "indexing programs"

Joe
--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>