lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LVS-NAT or direct routing or...? |
From: | Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 18 May 2006 10:48:06 -0700 (PDT) |
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Kristoffer Egefelt wrote: Problem: All mail looks like they come from the loadbalancer's primary ip. the client sends to the VIP; the reply must come from the VIP. With LVS-NAT you can associate a different name with each realserver. http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.services.single-port.html#http_checks look in the section on "indexing programs" Joe -- Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant mapgenerator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux! |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LVS-NAT or direct routing or...?, Kristoffer Egefelt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LVS-NAT or direct routing or...?, Kristoffer Egefelt |
Previous by Thread: | LVS-NAT or direct routing or...?, Kristoffer Egefelt |
Next by Thread: | Re: LVS-NAT or direct routing or...?, Kristoffer Egefelt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |