|To:||"LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: LVS-NAT or direct routing or...?|
|From:||Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Thu, 18 May 2006 10:48:06 -0700 (PDT)|
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Kristoffer Egefelt wrote:
Problem: All mail looks like they come from the loadbalancer's primary ip.
the client sends to the VIP; the reply must come from the VIP.
With LVS-NAT you can associate a different name with each realserver.
http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.services.single-port.html#http_checks look in the section on "indexing programs" Joe -- Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant mapgenerator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||LVS-NAT or direct routing or...?, Kristoffer Egefelt|
|Next by Date:||Re: LVS-NAT or direct routing or...?, Kristoffer Egefelt|
|Previous by Thread:||LVS-NAT or direct routing or...?, Kristoffer Egefelt|
|Next by Thread:||Re: LVS-NAT or direct routing or...?, Kristoffer Egefelt|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|