LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: LVS-NAT or direct routing or...?

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LVS-NAT or direct routing or...?
From: "Kristoffer Egefelt" <dr.fersken@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 21:46:02 +0200
Hello,

Problem:
All mail looks like they come from the loadbalancer's primary ip.

the client sends to the VIP; the reply must come from the VIP.

Thanks for your reply, but this is exactly the problem.
The reply don't come from the VIP, it comes from the loadbalancers primary
ipaddress.

It's like this:
Loadbalancer ip - 10.10.10.1
VIP - 10.10.10.2
Mailserver ip - 192.168.0.10

Mails from 192.168.0.10 originates from 10.10.10.1, I would like them to
originate from 10.10.10.2...

Thanks.

/Kristoffer


On 5/18/06, Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, 18 May 2006, Kristoffer Egefelt wrote:

> Problem:
> All mail looks like they come from the loadbalancer's primary ip.

the client sends to the VIP; the reply must come from the
VIP.


With LVS-NAT you can associate a different name with each
realserver.


http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.services.single-port.html#http_checks

look in the section on "indexing programs"

Joe
--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>