LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: LVS-NAT or direct routing or...?

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LVS-NAT or direct routing or...?
From: Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 04:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Kristoffer Egefelt wrote:

Thanks for your reply, but this is exactly the problem. The reply don't come from the VIP, it comes from the loadbalancers primary ipaddress.

apologies - I misread your original posting.

Setup:
1 debian 2.6 w. iptables -  LVS-NAT with 1 public and 1 private interface.
2 mailservers.

It's like this:
Loadbalancer ip - 10.10.10.1
VIP - 10.10.10.2
Mailserver ip - 192.168.0.10

Mails from 192.168.0.10 originates from 10.10.10.1, I would like them to
originate from 10.10.10.2...

This shouldn't happen. Do you have any iptables rules, packet munging of any sort, installed? If so try it without the rules.

Joe
--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>