Re: LVS-NAT or direct routing or...?

To: " users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LVS-NAT or direct routing or...?
From: Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 07:26:03 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, 22 May 2006, Graeme Fowler wrote:

On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 10:49 -0700, Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
so this traffic is not on a port that ipvsadm is
controlling and LVS ignores these reply packets?

That's the general idea.

I had quite forgotten that you could do this.

I remember how delighted I was when someone figured out that you could have packets emerging from the VIP and not from the primary IP


Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at Homepage It's GNU/Linux!

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>