LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: Geographically separated load balancers?

To: "'LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Geographically separated load balancers?
From: "Neil Aggarwal" <neil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:53:29 -0600
Joe:

I am thinking there will be two physical machines.
Each machine will run a director and a real server.

Are there any docs on how to set up the VIP and
routing for this scenario?

Thanks,
        Neil 


--
Neil Aggarwal, (214)986-3533, www.JAMMConsulting.com
FREE! Eliminate junk email and reclaim your inbox.
Visit http://www.spammilter.com for details.

-----Original Message-----
From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joseph Mack
NA3T
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 8:31 AM
To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
Subject: Re: Geographically separated load balancers?

On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Neil Aggarwal wrote:

> Hello:
>
> I am thinking of using LVS to set up a cluster with 2 machines
> each located in a different city for geographic redundancy.

do you want two realservers, each in a different place, or 
two directors each in a different place?

> Will LVS work correctly for load balancers on different
> subnets?

you'll have to arrange for the two different locations to 
accept packets for the VIP (or packets to the URL).

> Will the load balancers be able to communicate
> in order to detect failures and hand the workload to
> the other?

yes. you just have to set up the routing.

Joe

-- 
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>