LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] LVS + keepalived + QEMU + VDE2

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] LVS + keepalived + QEMU + VDE2
From: Gerry Reno <greno@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:19:49 -0400
Graeme Fowler wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 12:53 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>   
>> After looking at my LVS load balancing options 1-LAN or 2-LAN, in 
>> conjunction with my other needs such as ease of access to services such 
>> as shared storage,  I'm going to set things up as 1-LAN.  Now is 1-LAN 
>> just as reliable as 2-LAN?  Also, I'm going to put the load balancers 
>> for now in QEMU virtual machines and use VDE2 virtual switch to connect 
>> to the Host LAN.  Has anyone done this using QEMU and VDE2 yet?
>>     
>
> I have! I have!
>   
Yes! I knew somebody must have tried this.
> But it was two, or possibly three, years ago. And it wasn't VDE2, nor a
> decent version of QEMU either (it fell over a lot). But it sufficed as a
> proof of concept for an SSL proxy system I designed for someone (to
> offload the SSL overhead from a web farm to a pair of load-balanced
> Squids).
>
> As I recall, once I had the various virtual nets setup, and managed to
> get a reasonable system image to run under QEMU, the rest was just the
> same as making it work with a bunch of real machines. A bit slower, but
> just the same :)
>
> Concentrate on getting your host and guest machines running -
> standalone, if need be - then linking them up via your VDE network.
>
> Then - and only then - start tinkering with LVS. I still have the scabs
> on my knees from the experience (running before walking) :)
>   
Certainly have plenty of those myself. I'm taking it in small steps so 
we'll see how it goes. Really like the VDE2 virtual switch idea. Even 
has virtual cables.
> Graeme
>
>   
Gerry




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>