LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] LVS + keepalived + QEMU + VDE2

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] LVS + keepalived + QEMU + VDE2
From: Gerry Reno <greno@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:50:04 -0400
Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
> Can't read your ascii diagram, but it seems like I've seen 
> it before. Have you posted on this setup recently.
>
>
>   
>> The general setup is a single Inet NAT Router/GW box connected to a
>> switch (multi-VLAN 801q capable) that connects to all the servers. The
>> physical servers for this discussion are two web servers, two sql
>> servers, one shared storage server, two email servers, two file servers.
>> For simplicity lets just focus on the web and sql servers and the shared
>> storage server.
>>     
>
> you have two directors balancing http,sql (maybe the 
> clients access the http and the http accesses the 
> sql), smtp. There is a file server. This is a standard LVS. 
> There's no need for one network here.
>
>   
>> Just need to setup LVS and keepalived on load balancers add a
>> POSTROUTING rule on the load balancers and drop the default route on the
>> real servers (do I have that right?)
>>     
>
> it's in the HOWTO.
>
>   
>> Hints?
>>     
>
> looks like a standard LVS to me.
>
> Joe
>
>   
Ok, I think the only difference is that the clients access the http 
which accesses the sql, but the sql again is load balanced rather than 
pairing web/sql servers. But you're right, basically standard LVS pretty 
much. Back to the HOWTO...




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>